📓 Nope--Changing--responsive--to--reactive--doesn-t-explain-why-we-d-specify-a-server-side-Microsoft.md by @enki ☆

Nope! Changing ‘responsive’ to ‘reactive’ doesn’t explain why we’d specify a

server-side Microsoft…

Nope! Changing ‘responsive’ to ‘reactive’ doesn’t explain why we’d specify a server-side Microsoft stack in the context of a client-side problem on a blog about CSS, nor does it explain why we would drop words & punctuation in this context. It still seems more likely to me that the author meant “ASAP” in its conventional sense. Since she appears to be active in this thread, perhaps she can clarify.

By John Ohno on August 30, 2016.

[Canonical link](https://medium.com/@enkiv2/nope-changing-responsive-to- reactive-doesn-t-explain-why-we-d-specify-a-server-side- microsoft-1fcfb64e7be6)

Exported from Medium on September 18, 2020.

[[ modified: 2021-01-30 16:27 ]]