đź“• Node [[eeg]]
đź“„ eeg.md by @karlicoss

Table of Contents

OpenBCI is best apparently?

At Drexel we’ve had a lot of success with openBCI. I can’t comment on all of the other choices, but I think for the money, OpenBCI is a great choice. We’ve had an advanced undergraduate co-op in our lab working with it for about 2 months, and he’s gotten a 16ch board put together and connected to a 3d printed headset we bought, gotten openBCI fully running, connected it to OpenVIBE and begun running their modules. Full access to the data, including in Matlab.
https://github.com/OpenBCI

ganglion? https://shop.openbci.com/collections/frontpage/products/pre-order-ganglion-board?variant=13461804483 can do EEG, EMG, ECG

https://neurobb.com/t/is-there-really-no-affordable-user-friendly-neurofeedback-hardware-software-out-there/75

One option would be to go with OpenBCI hardware and a (relatively) inexpensive proprietary neurofeedback software option like BioEra 290. I have not used BioEra, but it is compatible with OpenBCI and is much more geared towards neurofeedback than BrainBay or OpenViBE. A somewhat more expensive hardware option is Pocket-Neurobics 325, which works with BioEra or BioExplorer, and is apparently popular among home neurofeedback trainers. As @curiositry mentioned, William Croft 104 is a great resource on this topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIWswAOFp8w

needs a special bt dongle?
mark 4 doesnt require any paste, it’s dry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agV1B2l-QLw

ok, so it looks pretty easy to filter individual frequencies too.

print it youself: about 500$ =/

could try using 3d printer at work?

http://www.autodidacts.io/getting-started-with-openbci-a-tutorial-on-testing-troubleshooting-and-recording-ekg/

+ The OpenBCI arrives pre-assembled and tested, and is relatively straightforward for someone without previous bci experience to get started with — no soldering, hair-tearing, or midnight coding sessions need appl

+ Finally, the OpenBCI’s output is far closer to clinical or research grade than most consumer or amateur systems: It has an excellent sample-rate (250 Hz), works with well-established processing and display software, and can be used with any electrodes with industry-standard “touchproof” connectors, so you aren’t stuck with the type it comes with.

? use 32 but Which should you choose? In most cases, it probably doesn’t matter. If you’ve used Arduino before, the 8bit would be a good choice. Also, the Arduino community is quite active and helpful. The 32bit version is more powerful, which means that it can do more processing on the signal before it’s sent over bluetooth. If you plan on doing a lot of with tinkering with the code running on the OpenBCI itself, the 32bit version may be a better choice.

? need 10-20 paste?

? TODO how to secure electrodes

- very little data on the internet and reddit.. unlikely to get any help if i buy it

eh. quite costy. so buy it, but ONLY after you consolidate all other sleep trackers so you could compare

Do you have fine control of your head and neck? If so then a headset with a gyro will be much better (Muse by InteraXon or Emotiv).

https://www.reddit.com/r/eeg/comments/6bqd63/looking_for_affordable_wired_personal_eeg/
https://www.reddit.com/r/eeg/comments/3vxbem/comparison_of_consumer_eeg_devices/
http://www.autodidacts.io/neurotech-hardware-roundup-eeg-bci-tdcs-neurofeedback/

ultracortex: 3d printed

[2018-07-15] how are EMG and EEG different? [[emg]]

ok, so surface EMG needs two electrodes since it’s recording potential difference

EMG? how can it be used [[emg]]

https://youtu.be/gHsZ0bwxMsg?t=3m21s
stronger exercise – stronger signal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromyography#Normal_results

Loading pushes...

Rendering context...